The DEVIL in Santorums Details!

•February 22, 2012 • Comments Off

Is it me or has Santorum always been this wacky and delusional? Enjoy the following article from Free Wood post;

Rick Santorum is currently underway developing a new peace strategy with Satan. He thoroughly believes that Satan himself is a direct terrorist threat to the United States of America. He has even stated that “Satan has his sights on the United States of America!” He is steadfast in his approach to rid the nation of Satan and his comrades.

Santorum is being very careful devising his plan for peace talks with the Devil. He knows that Satan can be very tricky and deceiving, and he will have to watch and listen to every detail during the peace negotiations.

“Satan is attacking the great institutions of America, using those great vices of pride, vanity, and sensuality as the root to attack all of the strong plants that has so deeply rooted in the American tradition.”

Free Wood Post was able to catch up with Satan for the rebuttal and defense of his actions:

“What Rick needs to understand is that I’m not trying to attack America, but rather offer an alternative to the strict theological rules of my old boss, the Notorious G.O.D. From what I hear and have read, the United States even allows for people to worship me if they so choose. It’s pretty neat that they have freedom of and from religion there…. Where I come from the issue of religious freedom is pretty hot and cold, you’re either in or out, and religion is the law of the land… I get stuck with all the ne’er-do-wellers that choose not to follow the rules of my old boss. Fine by me… I just don’t get why Rick doesn’t understand the Constitution of the country he is trying to lead.”

 

Santorum plans to meet with Satan sometime next week to hash out a plan to negotiate between their theological differences of opinion. The talks will happen in an undisclosed location, and Santorum will surround himself with 35 priests as his security detail. As the power of Christ compels Santorum to meet with the Dark Lord for the good of his country, only time will tell to see if the two of them can come to some sort of agreement without the need for force.

Santorum is prepared to do everything he needs to do to protect the nation from Satan, he will put the entire military budget towards Holy water, crucifixes, and nifty travel-size Bibles and prayer booklets for each and every citizen of the nation. He will not allow Satan to overcome this land, he will purify its intent and lead the nation into Glory! OR so he thinks.

It’s Gods Will…

•February 20, 2012 • Comments Off

According to Santorum, God’s Law supersedes the Constitution, I don’t know about you but that sounds downright UN-American and definitely not Patriotic. How in the world is this guy leading the GOP party in the polls? Is this a cruel joke being played on us by the GOP Establishment? Something they will pull away at the last minute so we all breath a sigh of relief that at least Romney isn’t as crazy as Mr. Frothy? Watch for Santorum to come close to taking it all only to be taken down by the same people who propped him up in the first place, he will crash because he is just a distraction right now while Romney looks like the sane one. When Mr. Frothy loses, he of course will say that “It was God’s Will” Was it?

Enjoy this article regarding Mr. Frothy’s view on Home Schooling;

Rick Santorum has declared war on modern day America. He doesn’t think Protestants are real Christians. He thinks we should be at war with all of Islam. He believes Americans should suffer because in his sick mind, suffering “is a good thing.” He believes strongly in income inequality. He also believes women should be relegated to the home and controlled by men. And now he wants to destroy the minds of our children.

During a speech at the Ohio Christian Alliance, Santorum told the crowd that public education is “an artifact” that must come to an end, and that parents should withdraw their children and rely on home schooling and online education.

The Los Angeles Times reports,

In the nation’s past, he said, “Most presidents home-schooled their children in the White House. Parents educated their children because it was their responsibility.

“Yes, the government can help, but the idea that the federal government should be running schools, frankly much less that the state government should be running schools, is anachronistic.”

Aside from schools for the children of military personnel, the federal government does not actually operate schools. Most U.S. schools are supported primarily by state or local funding, or a combination of the two.  Santorum said the public education system was an artifact of the Industrial Revolution, “when people came off the farms where they did home school or had a little neighborhood school, and into these big factories called public schools.”

Rick Santorum has been very vocal about his preference for home schooling. There’s a reason for this of course. He holds a grudge. Santorum enrolled his children in the Western Pennsylvania Cyber Charter School and stuck the taxpayers for 80% of the costs which were paid through the Penn Hills School District. In November 2004, Penn Hills asked Santorum to repay $67,000 in tuition costs because he and his family were spending most of the year in Virginia and did not meet the qualifications for residency status. So Santorum pulled his kids out of school and has home schooled them ever since. If parents are supposed to be responsible for teaching their own kids, how come Santorum wasn’t home schooling his children before 2004?

It’s clear that Rick Santorum has a problem with publicly funded schools. A public school caught him taking wrongful advantage of Pennsylvania taxpayers and he’s mad about it. So instead of taking responsibility for his actions like a real man would do, Santorum throws a hissy fit and decides that public education must be destroyed. Of course, if Santorum manages to destroy public schools, millions of lives will change. Home schooling is not easy and it’s not cheap either. Many parents simply do not have the time or money to home school their kids.

How does Rick Santorum expect a single mom to educate her children when she needs to work two jobs to feed and clothe them and pay the bills too? That may be a dumb question, since Santorum thinks single moms should just get married and stay at home. And that’s another topic altogether that’s equally offensive. Online classes are even more expensive and would still require a parent to stay at home and supervise.

Americans are already going in debt paying for college, they don’t need to go in debt paying for a K-12 education, but apparently that’s what Santorum wants.

8 Reasons Why We Endorse Newt Gingrich for the Republican Presidential Nomination

•January 24, 2012 • Comments Off
After reading the below article at addictinginfo.org, we at stupidpumas.net wholeheartedly endorse Newt Gingrich for the Republican Nomination, by nominating Newt you definitely make our job easy and the result of that means more relaxation time for us, Thanks Republicans!
Wife #1: New Gingrich had a secret romance with Jackie Battley, his high school geometry teacher and married her after graduation.Wife #1: New Gingrich had a secret romance with Jackie Battley, his high school geometry teacher and married her after graduation.

Just yesterday, a conservative Republican just suggested that I and others who were defending President Obama in on-line discussion were guilty of being “fanatical defenders the black messiah.”  The fact that the person resorted to highlighting President Obama’s race and tried to employ grandiose sarcasm with the intent of deriding us, is unfortunately, not the exception but the rule among conservatives these days.  Barack Obama is not just another liberal Democratic President, he is seen by many as the most diabolical, untrustworthy person to have ever been elected to high office.

For that and other reasons, this left of center Democrat really believes that to do justice by their die-hard constituents, the Republican Party must nominate New Gingrich to be their nominee in 2012.

Here are but a few reasons why the-Newt deserves the nod:

I. DERISIVE, FACT-LESS HYPERBOLE:  Conservative disdain for Barack Obama is so emotionally charged and consistently devoid of facts or reasoning, that the Republicans must nominate a skilled demagogue like Gingrich who can rally the faithful without any concern for the intellectual integrity of his rhetorical prose.  No Republican candidate is more qualified to charismatically deliver emotionally charged babble than Gingrich.

Wife #2: Gingrich had an affair with Marianne Ginther while married to wife #1.

II. WORLD-CLASS BULLY: Grassroots Republicans love a bully who can offer no constructive new ideas about anything, but who can easily denigrate more sophisticated, more thoughtful, more tolerant people who dare to challenge the convoluted, selfish reasoning of conservative populism.   Mitt Romney may be a bit too emotionally stable to offer the kind of bombastic, condescending rhetoric about the “cultural elite” that gives tea-party Republicans the kind of patriotic orgasm that makes them sure they are the real Constitutionally-correct Americans.

III. NO TO ANY HEALTH-CARE REFORM: President Obama will undoubtedly have to defend health-care reform in the upcoming campaign. Romney is intimately familiar with the issues involved and has, in the past, promoted programs that require government policies and regulation. Not “kewl.”  Conservative Republicans believe with every fiber of their being that government involvement in the delivery of health-care would result in nightmarish scenarios reminiscent of communist life under Stalin; decent Americans will be sent away by death panels to die in Obama’s secret gulag. Please, don’t try to convince them otherwise even though the same people who subscribe to such fantasies will kill anyone who threatens to stop their monthly Social Security, Medicare or Veteran benefit checks. Newt will never disappoint the masses with anything less than the standard Republican bull about how the private sector will treat everyone fairly if the big, bad government just gets of the way.

Wife #3: The-Newt was schtupping his staff member, Callista Bisek, while married to wife #2.

IV. NEWT ISN’T AFRAID TO BE POLITICALLY INCORRECT:  While Newt Gingrich “may” not personally be a racist, he knows, all to well, how to subtly acknowledge those politically incorrect “facts” about Muslims, Latinos and people of color that in their heart of hearts, conservatives know are true! Isn’t it wonderful that one Republican has the courage to acknowledge the truth about “them.” 

V. NO ONE FEIGNS RIGHTEOUS INDIGNATION BETTER: Social conservatives cannot back up most of their knee-jerk, holy roller clamor with facts. e.g. No where in the Old or New Testaments are there any definitive statements that say that life begins at conception or that falling in love with a members of the same gender is a sin. Like creative statisticians, prolific clergy have for centuries have been spinning religious propaganda to protect their power, jobs, institutions and the emotional equilibrium of simple people. In spite of all his posturing about having made peace with God over his countless affairs, failed marriages, deceitful verbiage and unethical back-room political shenanigans, New Gingrich is the quintessential, sanctimonious Christian hypocrite: “My cause is so holy, that I can do and say anything to insure my ultimate success!”

VI. AMERICANS NEED AN ENEMY TO HATE & ARM THEMSELVES AGAINST: Conservative Republicans tend to be provincial, xenophobic tribalists. Incendiary rhetoric about threats to America’s security come as easily to Newt Gingrich’s lips as lying to any of his wives does. And let’s be honest, except for the prospect of seeing naughty pictures of Ann Coulter dressed up as a dominatrix, is there anything that gets a down-home, grassroots conservative more excited than the prospect of a an enemy we need to arm ourselves against?

VII. GOVERNMENT IS THE ENEMY: President Obama has time and again made it clear that he is committed to embracing and nurturing an inclusive American society that is first in the world in education, high tech, manufacturing, health-care and social responsibility. Those Utopian “socialist” ideals are easy fodder for a professional agitator like Gingrich who incessantly promotes the lie that government cannot possibly be the catalyst for anything good. In fact, in keeping with GOP gospel, the-Newt will tell you with passion that government is the enemy of the American people. That said, he wants you to vote for him to  be the “enemy’s” CEO. If that makes any sense to you, you must be a Republican.

VIII. THE ULTIMATE HYPOCRITE:  Conservative Republicans want you to know that they are the party of common decency and family values. That said, they have an ever-growing list of “to hell with” causes:

  • To hell with taxes
  • To hell the environment
  • To hell with government regulations
  • To hell with workers rights
  • To hell with expensive, unnecessary government expenditures like education
  • To hell with immigrants, legal or not
  • To hell with all Muslims
  • To hell with all sexual deviants (LGBT people)
  • To hell with thousands of other issues that make people think too hard

Now honestly, which Republican presidential candidate is more qualified to promote a thoughtless, cynical, selfish, anti-people, pro-corporate agenda than the man who had a secret affair with his high school geometry teacher until he graduated and then married her (he was 19, she 26); the man who shamelessly tried to impeach a President for sexual indiscretions while he was having an affair with a staff member in his office; a man who time and again has proven have less scruples than a Koch brothers lobbyist?

Newt Gingrich is THE commensurate Republican.  No one can represent the morals and ethical standards of the Grand Old Party better.

Newt Gingrich: 23 Years of Quotes

•January 23, 2012 • 1 Comment

This is from my new favorite blog addictinginfo.org written by Matthew Desmond…. Enjoy!

Newt Gingrich has said some pretty wild things throughout his career. Here’s a list of some of the wacky things he’s said, compiled by the website Mother Jones;

1978 In an address to College Republicans before he was elected to the House, Gingrich says: “I think one of the great problems we have in the Republican party is that we don’t encourage you to be nasty. We encourage you to be neat, obedient, and loyal and faithful and all those Boy Scout words.” He added, “Richard Nixon…Gerald Ford…They have done a terrible job, a pathetic job. In my lifetime, in my lifetime—I was born in 1943—we have not had a competent national Republican leader. Not ever.”

1980 On the House floor, Gingrich states, “The reality is that this country is in greater danger than at any time since 1939.”

1980 Gingrich says: “We need a military four times the size of our present defense system.” (See 1984.)

1983 A major milestone: Gingrich cites former British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain on the House floor: “If in fact we are to follow the Chamberlain liberal Democratic line of withdrawal from the planet,” he explains, “we would truly have tyranny everywhere, and we in America could experience the joys of Soviet-style brutality and murdering of women and children.”

1983 He compares Democratic Speaker Tip O’Neill to Chamberlain: “He may not know any better. He may not understand freedom versus slavery…in the tradition of [former British Prime Ministers] Stanley Baldwin and Neville Chamberlain, whose only weakness was they left their nation with war with Nazi Germany.”

1984 “I am not a super hawk.”

1984 Gingrich takes advantage of the arrival of C-Span to deliver scathing condemnations of his colleagues. He accuses Democrats of appeasement and distributing “communist propaganda,” and threatens to press charges against them for writing a letter to Nicaraguan dictator Daniel Ortega. House Speaker Tip O’Neill calls it “the lowest thing that I’ve ever seen in my 32 years in Congress.”

1984 Gingrich touts a study being compiled by conservative House Republicans, noting it “will argue that it is time to stop challenging or seeming to challenge the patriotism of Democrats and liberals. Enough historical evidence exists.”

1984 “It used to be called socialism. It is now just sort of liberal Democratic platform pledges.”

1985 Gingrich calls Reagan’s upcoming meeting with Mikhail Gorbachev ”the most dangerous summit for the West since Adolf Hitler met with Chamberlain in 1938 at Munich.”

1985 Gingrich compares a disputed House election in Indiana to the Holocaust. “We have talked a lot in recent weeks about the Holocaust, about the incredible period in which Nazi Germany killed millions of people and, in particular, came close to wiping out European Jewry. Someone said to me two days ago, talking frankly about the McIntyre affair [in which Democrats refused to seat the winner of a House race until they'd conducted a recount] and the efforts by the Democratic leadership not to allow the people of Indiana to have their representative but, instead, to impose upon them somebody else, something in which he quotes [German poet Martin] Niemoller, and I have never quite until tonight been able to link it together—Niemoller, the great German theologian, said at one point: ‘When the Nazis came for the Jews, I did nothing…and when the Nazis came for me, there was no one left.’”

1985 Upset with Democrats’ foreign policy stance, Gingrich observes, “Adolph Hitler must somewhere be burning in hell, wishing he had lived two generations later, so he could manipulate Americans instead of Englishmen.”

1985 He’s got the world in the palm of his hand: “I have an enormous personal ambition. I want to shift the entire planet…I just had breakfast with [administration officials Richard] Darman and [David] Stockman because I’m unavoidable. I represent real power.”

1987 Gingrich takes to the House floor to decry…pretty much everything about the Democratic-run House: “After the first five months of this Congress, I must report to my fellow citizens that this 100th Congress may be the most irresponsible, destructive, corrupt, and unrepresentative Congress of the modern era… In future weeks, I will make a series of speeches outlining the threats of corruption, of communism, and of the left-wing machine which runs the House.”

1988 Gingrich discusses his midlife crisis: “I spent a fair length of time trying to come to grips with who I was and the habits I had, and what they did to people that I truly loved. I really spent a period of time where, I suspect, I cried three or four times a week. I read Men Who Hate Women and the Women Who Love Them and I found frightening pieces that related to…my own life.”

1989 He explains to the Washington Post why he fights with his second wife, Marianne: “It’s not even that it matters to me. It’s just the habit of dominance, the habit of being the center of my staff and the center of the news media.” Newt gives the marriage a “53–47″ shot of surviving.

1989 After taking down Speaker Jim Wright (D-Texas) by filing a string of ethics charges, Gingrich basks in his role as giant-killer. “If you’re not in the Washington Post every day,” he says, “you might as well not exist.”

1989 Gingrich lays out his electoral roadmap: “The left-wing Democrats will represent the party of total hedonism, total exhibitionism, total bizarreness, total weirdness, and the total right to cripple innocent people in the name of letting hooligans loose.”

1989 “These people are sick,” he says of congressional Democrats. “They are so consumed by their own power, by a Mussolini-like ego, that their willingness to run over normal human beings and to destroy honest institutions is unending.” He also warns that unless the Democrats are stopped, “we may literally see our freedom decay and decline.”


1990 Gingrich’s political action committee, GOPAC, sends out a memo titled “Language: A Key Mechanism of Control” to several thousand Republican candidates running for state and local offices. It includes a list of words they should use to describe Democrats:

decay, failure (fail) collapse(ing) deeper, crisis, urgent(cy), destructive, destroy, sick, pathetic, lie, liberal, they/them, unionized bureaucracy, “compassion” is not enough, betray, consequences, limit(s), shallow, traitors, sensationalists, endanger, coercion, hypocricy, radical, threaten, devour, waste, corruption, incompetent, permissive attitude, destructive, impose, self-serving, greed, ideological, insecure, anti-(issue): flag, family, child, jobs; pessimistic, excuses, intolerant, stagnation, welfare, corrupt, selfish, insensitive, status quo, mandate(s) taxes, spend (ing) shame, disgrace, punish (poor…) bizarre, cynicism, cheat, steal, abuse of power, machine, bosses, obsolete, criminal rights, red tape, patronage.

1990 Speaking privately to a group of supporters, Gingrich says he’s changing his public role from “explainer of political tactics to explainer of cultural change.”

1992 While campaigning for President George H. W. Bush in Georgia, Gingrich uses Woody Allen as a symbol for what Democrats want to do to America: “Woody Allen had non-incest with his non-daughter because they were a non-family.” He adds, “It fits the Democratic Party platform perfectly.” Bush distances himself from the remarks.

1994 A South Carolina woman, Susan Smith, murders her two sons. Gingrich draws the only logical conclusion: “I think that the mother killing the two children in South Carolina vividly reminds every American how sick the society is getting and how much we need to change things. The only way you get change is to vote Republican.”

1994 He sums up his political philosophy: “People like me are what stand between us and Auschwitz. I see evil all around me every day.”

1995 Following the House GOP’s triumphant 1994 election victory, Gingrich sends all the Republican freshman House members copies of the GOPAC memo suggesting they refer to their opponents as “traitors.”

1995 Gingrich releases a novel he co-authored, 1945, in which the Waffen-SS invades eastern Tennessee. But most critics fixate on the opening scene, in which a high-ranking Washington politico, unsatisfied with his marriage, engages in an affair that ultimately brings about his own political demise:

Playfully, to drive home the potential loss, she bit his shoulder, then kissed it better.

“Aw, hell, I don’t want to…I wish I could just divorce Mrs. Little Goodie Two-Shoes!”

“I like this arrangement,” she laughed softly. “Mistress to the chief of staff of the President of the United States. Nice title, don’t you think? Such a book I could write.” …Suddenly the pouting sex kitten gave way to Diana the Huntress. She rolled onto him and somehow was sitting athwart his chest, her knees pinning his shoulders. “Tell me, or I will make you do terrible things,” she hissed.

Gingrich calls the book “PG-13.”

1995 Marianne tells Vanity Fair she will “undermine everything” if Gingrich runs for president in 1996. Gignrich tells reporters his wife was “just making the point hypothetically.”

1995 Gingrich examines the United States’ handling of the conflict in Bosnia and falls back ona familiar refrain: “The UN acts totally impotently and undermines the morale of every law-abiding democracy on the planet. This is the worst performance by the democracies since the 1930s.”

1996 Gingrich applies the same analogy to President Clinton’s policies in the Middle East, in a speech to the Center for Security Policy: “The democracies are in a greater danger than they have been at any time since [British Prime Minister] Stanley Baldwin lied to the English people about the Luftwaffe and Hitler’s Germany.”

1998 Gingrich steps down as Speaker, amid ethics complaints and rumors of an extramarital affair. He frames his decision in pragmatic terms: “I’m willing to lead, but I’m not willing to preside over people who are cannibals.”

1998 Gingrich divorces Marianne. A later Esquire profile offers a glimpse of the last days, from Marianne’s point of view:

Gingrich just kept saying she was a Jaguar and all he wanted was a Chevrolet. “‘I can’t handle a Jaguar right now.’ He said that many times. ‘All I want is a Chevrolet.’”

2004 Gingrich tells Fox News that liberal financier George Soros’ opposition to George W. Bush might be due to his ties to drug cartels: “[He] wants to spend $75 million defeating [President] George W. Bush because Soros wants to legalize heroin.”

2005 Gingrich’s latest greatest threat to America is the American Civil Liberties Union. “[I]t’s almost as though they were into destruction for its own sake and weakening and undermining America for its own sake.” He also labels the group “a consistently destructive organization that is opposed to and undermines the values of most Americans, and takes positions that are consistently weakening the security of the United States.”

2006 Asked whether he agrees with then-Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld’s comments that opposition to the Bush administration’s Iraq policy is tantamount to appeasing Hitler, Gingrich responds, “Yes.”

2006 Gingrich casts the Bush administration’s War on Terror in the kind of sweeping terms he normally reserves for, well, everything else: “We’re in the early stages of what I would describe as the third World War.”

2007 Gingrich makes the case for war in Iran and Syria by using his favorite analogy: “It makes no sense to have a Holocaust Museum in Washington and yet have no honest assessment of the threat of a 21st century Holocaust.”

2007 “We should replace bilingual education with immersion in English so people learn the common language of the country and they learn the language of prosperity, not the language of living in a ghetto.” Two years later, Gingrich unveils a new Spanish-language website, The Americano.

2008 Following the presidential election, Gingrich calls for a new era of “tri-partisan” cooperation in Washington.

2008 Gingrich tells Bill O’Reilly that “there is a gay and secular fascism in this country that wants to impose its will on the rest of us.” The gay and secular fascist movement, Gingrich charges, is “prepared to use violence, to use harassment. I think it is prepared to use the government if it can get control of it.”

2009 On Democratic opposition to the continuing war in Afghanistan, Gingrich breaks out a familiar line: “The last few weeks have been worse than Chamberlain. This is Baldwin in 1935, just willfully blind because he didn’t want to tell the British people the truth because it would offend them.”

2009 Gingrich compares the Obama administration to the Chinese Cultural Revolution. “I just have this interesting idea of asking [then White House communications director] Anita Dunn if this is her idea of a cultural revolution and if she really wishes that she could get Sean Hannity and the other Fox commentators to go to a farm and work the way Mao sent the intellectuals out.”

2010 Gingrich warns that Obama’s agenda “would mean the end of America as it has been for the last 400 years.”

2010 Gingrich argues that Muslims don’t have a right to build a mosque in Lower Manhattan: “They’re trying to make a case about supremacy…Nazis don’t have the right to put up a sign next to the Holocaust museum in Washington.”

2010 Sign of the times: Gingrich swaps gay secular fascism for “secular-socialist machine“—which he says “represents as great a threat to America as Nazi Germany or the Soviet Union once did.”

2010 A year after writing a book about noted anti-colonialist George Washington, Gingrich suggests that the current president holds a radical, anti-British worldview of his own. “What if [Obama] is so outside our comprehension, that only if you understand Kenyan, anti-colonial behavior, can you begin to piece together [his actions]?” Gingrich asks. “That is the most accurate, predictive model for his behavior.”

2010 Gingrich sounds the alarm about a new threat facing America: “We should have a federal law that says Sharia law cannot be recognized by any court in the United States.”

2011 Gingrich tells the Christian Broadcasting Network’s David Brody that he was driven to his cheat on his previous two wives because of his one true love: America. “There’s no question at times of my life, partially driven by how passionately I felt about this country, that I worked far too hard and things happened in my life that were not appropriate.”

2011 Secular-socialists give way to atheist-Islamists: “I am convinced that if we do not decisively win the struggle over the nature of America, by the time [his grandchildren are] my age they will be in a secular atheist country, potentially one dominated by radical Islamists and with no understanding of what it once meant to be an American.” His spokesman later clarified that Gingrich meant either Islamists or atheists would take over America, not both.

Newt Gingrich and the Republicans are Ruining Traditional Marriage

•January 22, 2012 • Comments Off
from underthemountainbunker.com

Newt Gingrich has cheapened the institution of marriage through his behavior, and the people who support Gingrich and allow him to get away with his womanizing, divorces and multiple marriages are damaging the institution even further.

The vows of marriage say “til death do us part”, but that was too long to wait for Newt.

Newt Gingrich admits that he sinned and his first marriage failed because, “all humans sin”.  So, when it comes to marriage, Mr. Gingrich is an admitted sinner. Adultery is a sin, and the Republicans who accept Newt and his sin should understand that adultery leads to man on dog sex, sex between gerbils and cats and other unholy matrimonies.

Moreover, while Gingrich cheapened his own marriage with non-wife blow jobs, he was working in the House to impeach President Clinton for his non-wife blow jobs.

Newt’s second wife recently accused him of wanting an open marriage. But that’s okay with Republicans in South Carolina, where Gingrich won the latest primary. If you don’t see the hypocrisy yet, imagine if Secretary of State Clinton had said, “Bill wanted an open marriage”? Republicans would have been on this like crap on shit. Open marriages and the Republican acceptance of them are ruining the sanctity of marriage like vampire on human sex.

And how did Republicans, those willing to vote for an adulterer, sinner, and divorcee, feel about the Weiner bulge of 2011. No, the Weiner bulge wasn’t a German Panzer attack in WWII, it was the photo that Democratic Representative Anthony Weiner sent of the outline of his penis in underwear to a female college student he had met online. It became a massive issue for Republicans wanting to rid themselves of this brash liberal Representative. So a few sexual innuendoes and attacks later (even Democrats asked Weiner to resign) he resigned for doing less than Newt has done to ruin the sanctity of marriage. As far as we know, Weiner kept his penis in his shorts, Gingrich did not.

By mixing faith, redemption and adultery, Mr. Gingrich has created a new form of politics where sinning is okay. “Newt is apparently trying to create a new hybrid form, Christian adultery.”

And Republicans defend him by stating that his three marriages prove that Gingrich is qualified to be president. One example of this is from Dr. Keith Ablow  (yes, his name really is Ablow).

So, here’s what one interested in making America stronger can reasonably conclude—psychologically—from Mr. Gingrich’s behavior during his three marriages:

1) Three women have met Mr. Gingrich and been so moved by his emotional energy and intellect that they decided they wanted to spend the rest of their lives with him.

2) Two of these women felt this way even though Mr. Gingrich was already married. 

3 ) One of them felt this way even though Mr. Gingrich was already married for the second time, was not exactly her equal in the looks department and had a wife (Marianne) who wanted to make his life without her as painful as possible. 

Conclusion: When three women want to sign on for life with a man who is now running for president, I worry more about whether we’ll be clamoring for a third Gingrich term, not whether we’ll want to let him go after one.”

I have another conclusion to make from the idea that sexual encounters qualify you for president. Why not vote for Wilt Chamberlain for president, who claims to have had 20,000 sexual encounters with women? Now that’s qualification!

Let’s look at Newt’s own excuse for his affairs. He says that he felt so passionately about the United States that it caused him to leave his cancer riddled wife and later, “while he was leading a party that was making the case that a U.S. President shouldn’t be having on-the-job sexual encounters with interns, using his staff and appointees to cover it up, and lying about it under oath in court, to commence a second extra-marital affair of his own.” 

And now when the media asks about his marriages, (after helping Republicans attack Clinton in the drawn out impeachment hearings) Newt is incensed,

“I think the destructive, viscous, negative nature of much of the news media makes it harder to government this country, harder to attract decent people to run this country and I am appalled that you would being a presidential debate on a topic like that.” 

And Republicans in Congress have spent Obama’s whole term using destructive, viscous and negative attacks against the President, thus making it hard for him to govern.

Newt continues, “Every person in here has had someone close to them go through painful things, to take an ex-wife, and make it (an issue) two days before the primary a significant question in a presidential campaign, is as close to despicable as anything I can imagine.”

I am so glad the media and the Republicans didn’t treat Clinton or Weiner so despicably.

So Newt Gingrich and South Carolina’s Republicans support the adulterer while blocking marriage for homosexuals who might “ruin the sanctity” of the institution. In the meantime, I will be passing around my “Wilt for President” petition.

This post is not condone extramarital affairs nor does it care if candidates have them. I am more concerned with liars and hypocrites running for office and those that would keep rights from others because of their religious bigotry.

“When Mitt Romney Came to Town” (Full Video)

•January 12, 2012 • Comments Off

The Full Length Video in 2 Parts…Enjoy!

Scary…

More Santorum Frothy Dirt!

•January 10, 2012 • Comments Off

Well well well, it seems like some interesting dirt has surfaced regarding Mr. Frothy and his wife, read on my dear readers and enjoy;

Rick Santorum’s Wife Was In Unmarried Relationship With Abortion Doctor

by David Badash from The New Civil Rights Movement .com on January 10, 2012

in Bigotry Watch,Marriage,News,Politics

Post image for Rick Santorum’s Wife Was In Unmarried Relationship With Abortion Doctor

Rick Santorum‘s wife Karen, before their marriage, was living in an unmarried relationship with the founder of Pittsburgh’s first abortion clinic in the 1970′s, left the doctor to marry Santorum, and at the time both Karen and Rick Santorum claimed to be pro-choice. Further, the doctor, OBGYN Tom Allen, is the same man who actually delivered Karen Santorum (then Karen Garver,) and is 40 years her senior.

(Editorial note: Rick Santorum’s attacks on the lives and relationships of unmarried people, including but not limited to people within the LGBT community, we feel allow for this level of scrutiny on both his past and that of his family. The Santorums’ life choices certainly are theirs to make, but building a political career attacking the lives of good, decent, LGBT  Americans, pledging to “die on the hill” to stop same-sex marriage equality is not one of them. We’re not judging their choices, as fervently as we disagree with them, we’re highlighting their hypocrisy and their mistaken view that they have the right to judge us for who we are.)

A lengthy 2005 profile in a local Philadelphia newspaper, which includes an interview with Santorum, quotes Dr. Allen, Karen’s former boyfriend:

“When she moved out to go be with Rick, she told me I’d like him, that he was pro-choice and a humanist,” said Allen, an elderly but vibrant man, during a brief conversation on the porch of his Pittsburgh row home. “But I don’t think there’s a humanist bone in that man’s body.”

The profile also reveals that both of Rick Santorum’s parents worked for the federal government, the Veterans Administration, and were housed on the grounds of the VA hospital. Santorum’s father was the chief of psychology, his mother the chief of nurses, the profile reveals. So much for Santorum being able to understand current medical stances on homosexuality, and so much for Santorum’s position on small government.

Ironically, the profile (remember, this is from 2005,) includes this line:

“He had Republican values,” adds U.S. Rep. Tom Feeney, another college friend of Santorum’s. “But it’s not like he was running around leading conservative jihads or anything.”

The profile also adds:

Santorum’s views on abortion changed around this time as well, recalls [Rick's] cousin.

“Our extended family has many strong women in it, who are intelligent and outspoken. There was one year Rick stopped by a family reunion for an hour or two. It was around the time he was ‘rising to power’ and becoming rabidly, ridiculously conservative. His views on abortion were quite contentious that year, and for those few hours of his visit, the women all descended upon him like flies, calling him on his change of views. He had always been pro-choice to my recollection. That’s why it was such a heated issue that year. The women in my family felt betrayed.”

A Washington Post profile of Karen Santorum, published today, notes, Karen “recalls their first meeting: He was the lawyer at the big firm, she was the law student. She says that she was the headstrong career woman. ‘But I came home that night and wrote in my diary that I had met the man I was going to marry.’ As hard as it may be to picture, she says, ‘He sang all the way to the restaurant’ on their first date.”

In this 2006 video, released by true Santorum campaign, Karen Santorum says, “I think it’s really sad, I think it’s tragic, that our opponent would use my family, go after my children, in the way he has, for political gain.”

Lost on Mrs. Santorum is how she and her husband are going after our families, our children every day, for political gain. The scales are severely unbalanced.

Carole Joffee, a University of California, San Francisco professor, in her article, “Collision of Reality and Ideology: Karen Santorum’s Past and Rick Santorum’s Vision of Your Future,” writes,

Normally, I feel that the past sexual history of a candidate’s spouse should be off limits to journalists and bloggers. But given Santorum’s rising fortunes as a serious candidate for the presidency, and in particular, his astonishing views on sexuality and contraception, I believe that attention to Karen Santorum’s past is warranted in this instance.

What does all this have to with Karen Santorum’s past, before her marriage to the Senator?  In simplest terms, Mrs. Santorum was living in a situation–unmarried but cohabitating, and presumably using birth control—that has become only more common in American society since the late 1980s, when she lived with Dr. Allen. (Indeed, the only difference between Karen Santorum and millions of other Americans in similar circumstances, then and now, was the unusually large gap in age between her and her partner).

In short, Rick Santorum’s stated policy positions, which include not only his well known obsession with abolishing legal abortion, but also his opposition to birth control and all nonprocreative sexual acts, are greatly out of step with the lives of the vast majority of Americans.  Clearly, the Santorums have changed their views over time on the issues of premarital sex and contraception as well as abortion, moving in a far more conservative direction. The couple has attributed these changes to a deepening religious faith, and such new beliefs are of course their right. But the Senator’s fervent desire to deny the rest of us the sexual and reproductive choices that his own wife once enjoyed is breathtakingly hypocritical and cruel.

Indeed.

 

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.